Live — 2025–26 Season

Find your edge
on the touchline

Football intelligence that goes beyond results. TouchlineAlpha rates every manager and club using a dynamic ELO system built on two signals: performance relative to market expectations, and points earned relative to squad value.

Explore Rankings
5,573 Managers · 1,197 Clubs · 38 Leagues · 25+ Years of Data · Real-time Coverage
Hero visual — coming soon

Built for the decisions that define clubs

How do you objectively rate a football manager? Clubs are constantly making high-stakes hiring decisions, yet evaluating a manager's true impact is messy. Results alone don't tell the full story, but they are often treated as if they do. TouchlineAlpha is built to solve exactly this problem, providing an evidence-based rating for every manager separating noise from actual managerial contribution.

Managers
Manager Rankings
Every professional manager ranked by ELO rating, ELO average and Career Value. Search by league, club or era to evaluate managers, identify undervalued talent, or validate a shortlist before making an appointment.
View rankings
Manager ELO Timelines
A match-by-match visualisation of any manager's career performance. Overlay multiple managers to compare trajectories, identify peak periods, and understand how performance changes across different clubs and contexts. Visualise recent form before making an appointment.
Explore timelines
Manager Performance Matrix
A league-wide snapshot of every manager's current ELO against their season momentum. Instantly identify who is improving, who is declining, and who is outperforming expectations before the market catches on.
View matrix
Clubs
Club Rankings
Every professional club ranked by ELO rating, ELO average and Historical Value. Search by league or era to evaluate clubs, understand which organisations consistently extract value from their managers, and identify those underperforming relative to their resources.
View clubs
Club ELO Timelines
Track any club's performance match by match across seasons. Overlay multiple clubs to compare trajectories, identify peak periods, and understand how performance shifts across different managerial regimes and investment cycles.
Explore timelines
Club Manager History
A side-by-side comparison of every manager's ELO performance at a given club. Understand which appointments drove genuine improvement, whether a club follows a consistent approach to hiring, and whether systematic factors within the club are affecting manager performance.
Explore history
Club Performance Matrix
The full league mapped by current ELO and season momentum. Instantly identify which clubs are improving, which are declining, and which are underperforming relative to their resources before the market catches on.
View matrix

See what results hide

All managers and clubs start with an ELO of 1500, the system's performance baseline, representing performance in line with market expectations and squad value. Ratings update dynamically after every match, with scores above 1500 signalling outperformance and scores below signalling underperformance.

Managers
Premier League: Manager Rankings 2025–26 Season
Loading rankings…
Premier League: Guardiola vs Klopp vs Arteta Aug 2016 – Present
Loading chart…
Spanish La Liga: Manager Performance Matrix 2025–26 Season
Loading matrix…
Clubs
French Ligue 1: Club Rankings 2025–26 Season
Loading rankings…
Club ELO: Leicester City vs Millwall Aug 2013 – Present
Loading chart…
Club Manager History: Chelsea FC 2000 – Present
Loading chart…
Italian Serie A: Club Performance Matrix 2025–26 Season
Loading matrix…

Two signals. One rating.

The core idea is simple: wisdom of the crowd. By aggregating bookmaker odds and removing margins, we get consensus probabilities for match outcomes. From there, we measure how consistently a manager over- or underperforms expectations. One upset is noise. Sustained overperformance is signal.

Markets, however, adapt. So the model also incorporates a budget efficiency component, using points relative to squad value. This balances managers working with vastly different resources, rewarding both those who deliver with elite squads and those who outperform with limited ones.

Read the full methodology